Posts

Showing posts from September, 2019

SC: Candidates are required to have "enough money"; if not, they are "panggulo"

Image
"Financial capability to wage a nationwide campaign" means "enough money" and it is one of the requirements to run for a national elective office. In fact, a candidate who cannot "afford to wage a nationwide campaign and/or [who] are nominated by political parties" are declared by the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) as "nuisance candidates." In Filipino, they are considered "mga panggulo lang." (G.R. No. 161872 and G.R. No. 177179) A "nuisance candidate" is one who "has been filed to put the election process in mockery or disrepute or to cause confusion among the voters by the similarity of the names of the registered candidates or by other circumstances or acts which clearly demonstrate that the candidate has no bona fide intention to run for the office for which the certificate of candidacy has been filed and thus prevent a faithful determination of the true will of the electorate." In 2004, a petition was f

Preamble - Possible Recitation Questions

Image
We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane society, and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity, the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain and promulgate this Constitution. [1] Is the Preamble an important part of the Constitution? [2] Does it have any function? [3] What does Estrada v. Escritor teach about the Preamble? [4] What does Re: Tony Q. Valenciano teach about the Preamble? [5] Why does the Preamble say "sovereign Filipino people"? [6] Why does the Preamble say "establish a Government"?

Expert proposes 3 changes to the Constitution

Image
The following are changes to the Constitution proposed by Former Chief Justice Artemio Villaseñor Panganiban . Panganiban was named as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in 1995. Panganiban was also known for his controversial role in helping install then Vice President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo as President in 2001 after the downfall of Joseph Estrada. Panganiban was named Supreme Court Chief Justice on December 20, 2005 by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo after Hilario Davide Jr. retired at age 70. Comments to chiefjusticepanganiban@hotmail.com. SOURCE:  Artemio V. Panganiban (2016). Other constitutional revisions. Philippine Daily Inquirer / 12:24 AM September 25, 2016. https://opinion.inquirer.net/97642/other-constitutional-revisions. [1] Philippine territory. The very first article of our Charter, “National Territory,” needs to conform to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The article does not expressly include the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) a

National Territory - Possible Recitation Questions

Image
The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines. [1] What does the National Territory (NT) comprise? [2] What is an archipelago? [3] How do other territories become part of our NT? [4] What are insular shelves? [5] What is the doctrine of regime of islands? [6] What is the archipelagic doctrine? [7] Is Article I consistent with the regime of islands doctrine? [8] What are baselines? [9] What are the two types of baselines? [10] What is the purpose of baselines? [11] Is the straight baseli

New doctrine of inordinate delay (2018)

Image
Every accused has the rights to due process and to speedy disposition of cases. Inordinate delay in the resolution and termination of a preliminary investigation will result in the dismissal of the case against the accused. Delay, however, is not determined through mere mathematical reckoning but through the examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding each case. Courts should appraise a reasonable period from the point of view of how much time a competent and independent public officer would need in relation to the complexity of a given case. Nonetheless, the accused must invoke his or her constitutional rights in a timely manner. The failure to do so could be considered by the courts as a waiver of right. (G.R. No. 206438. July 31, 2018) The concept of inordinate delay was introduced in Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, where the Supreme Court was constrained to apply the "radical relief' of dismissing the criminal complaint against an accused due to the delay in the term

Unconstitutionality of the PhiLSAT

Image
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court to question the legality of the Philippine Law School Admission Test (PhiLSAT). The main issue is whether the admission test violates separation of powers. Separation of powers dictates that government branches not interfere with the other or others in their discharge of their functions. Whether or not the regulation of law schools is within the sole power and prerogative of the Supreme Court is an issue yet to be passed upon. Another issue is academic freedom. The 1987 Philippine Constitution states that, "Academic Freedom shall be enjoyed in all institutions of higher learning." The institutional academic freedom includes the right of the school or college to decide and adopt its aims and objectives, and to determine how these objections can best be attained, free from outside coercion or interference, save possibly when the overriding public welfare calls for some restraint. The essential freedoms subsumed in the term &q

Top 10 things about the Preamble

Image
We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane society, and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity, the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain and promulgate this Constitution. [1] It is neither a part nor an important part of the 1987 Constitution. If it were, it would be Article I but it is not. [2] It has 75 words. The Preamble to the US Constitution has 52 words while the longest is the Preamble to the Constitution of India, which has 85 words. [3] Our Preamble is one of the 8 most notable preambles to the Constitutions of the world. Others are the Preamble to the United Nations Charter, the Preamble to the Constitution of India, the Preamble to the United States Constitution, the Pream

Did you know RA 9262 also protects males?

Image
Many people say that Republic Act No. (RA) 9262 protects only females or "women," as used in the law itself. RA 9262 is more popularly known as the Anti-Violence against Women and their Children (Anti-VAWC) Act. Said law declares as a policy that the State values the dignity of women and children and guarantees full respect for human rights. The State also recognizes the need to protect the family and its members particularly women and children , from violence and threats to their personal safety and security. Towards this end, the State shall exert efforts to address violence committed against women and children in keeping with the fundamental freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution and the Provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination Against Women, Convention on the Rights of the Child and other international human rights instruments of which the Philippines is a party. Therefore, the law

Imprescriptible reconveyance

Image
If the person claiming to be the owner of the property is in actual possession thereof, the right to seek reconveyance, which in effect seeks to quiet title to the property, DOES NOT PRESCRIBE , the reason being that one who is in actual possession of a piece of land claiming to be the owner thereof may wait until his possession is disturbed or his title is attacked before taking steps to vindicate his right. (Aliño vs. Heirs of Angelica A. Lorenzo) "Does not prescribe" (imprescriptible) refers to the legal status of a right being NOT subject to acquisition or loss despite lapse of time. In other words, if a right is imprescriptible, it cannot be lost by the owner or acquired by another person. It remains. In order that an action for quieting of title may prosper, two requisites must concur: [1] The plaintiff or complainant has a legal or equitable title or interest in the real property subject of the action; and [2] The deed, claim, encumbrance, or proceeding clai

SC scolds 2 lawyers for misleading firm name

Image
In Kokubu v. Tongo, it was found that respondents used the firm name Calatrava Tongo Law Office in a letter addressed to the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA). Respondent Atty. Rodrigo T. Tongo (Tongo) likewise used the same firm name in two letters addressed to complainant and his client's (Marcial G. Digal's) parents. Respondent Atty. Remie A. Calatrava (Calatrava) allowed respondent Tongo to indicate his name in respondent Tongo's letterhead despite his categorical statement that they were not partners and that they practice their profession independently. Thus, the use of the firm name Calatrava Tongo Law Office is clearly violative of Rule 3.02, Canon 3 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), for misleading the public. Rule 3.02, Canon 3 of the CPR states: Rule 3.02 —  In the choice of a firm name, no false, misleading or assumed name shall be used.  The continued use of the name of a deceased partner is permissible provided that the firm indicates in a

How long are SC cases? Why so many pages???

Image
Supreme Court decisions can sometimes be too long. The best examples of such are the cases of Poe-Llamanzares v. Comelec and Francisco v. House. The majority opinion in Poe-Llamanzares has 18,308 words. However, the full text of the case, including separate opinions, has 688 pages . That is almost the length of a typical law textbook. Writing about the above-mentioned case, Tan (2016) observed: "[T]he 688-page decision will torment students and generate fascinating debate in the coming years. This is normal. The most intimate Supreme Court debates are intergenerational. Our most powerful ideas draw strength not just from intellectual rightness, but from the weight of history shaped by far more than a single decision or a single set of justices." The decision in Francisco is one of the most traumatic cases to read in law school. In fact, the majority decision alone has 30,377 words . In the United States, the opinions in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,

15 things before going to law school (Part 3)

Image
In Part 1, we focused on things you should expect when you enter law school. In Part 2, the discussion involved specific and general subjects in law school. Please read Parts 1 and 2 before proceeding with the content below. This is Part 3. This time, we focus on textbooks, codals and cases. In the next parts, we will look into recitations, exams and quizzes. [1] Do not immediately buy textbooks. You may buy the wrong author or the wrong version. An example of this would be an experience by my classmate in law school. She heard that our labor law professor's favorite book was Azucena so she immediately bought one online. Unfortunately, she bought Azucena's Everyone's Labor Code, same author but different target audience (undergraduate students). It is best to wait for the professor's prescribed book or recommendation. If he does not have any, wait until he starts asking questions during recitation or watch out for whatever book he carries around with him or reads

SC: Craft = aggravating circumstance

Image
Craft involves intellectual trickery and cunning on the part of the accused. When there is a direct inducement by insidious words or machinations, fraud is present. Craft can be used in order not to arouse the suspicion of the victims and thus make them vulnerable to the accused's criminal minds. In one case, the accused tricked the victims by pretending that they needed a ride. (G.R. No. 113245-47. August 18, 1997) On 12 January 1991, Fidel Manio and Saturnina Bioser, with eight-year old Mark Anthony Malinao, were on board a "Toyota Tamaraw" on their way to Calumpit, Bulacan. When the vehicle momentarily stopped at the "Malolos crossing," Manuzon, a distant relative and former worker of Manio, approached the vehicle and asked Manio if he (Manuzon) and his three companions, namely, Bayan, Ramos and Disipulo, could be allowed to hitchhike. Manio acceded. The "hitchhikers" took the backseat of the vehicle. At the Alido Heights along MacArthur Highway

Bringing packed lunch to school NOT a right – SC

Image
The Supreme Court of Italy ruled in favor of giving schools the power to ban packed lunches on campus. NOTE:  The "Supreme Court of Cassation" is the highest court of appeal or court of last resort in Italy. It has its seat in the Palace of Justice, Rome. It has been a tradition for Italian students and teachers to all sit together and eat the same lunch from the school cafeteria. However, some parents of students began preparing home-cooked meals for their children because cafeteria food is usually expensive and unhealthy. Following this action, a group of parents from Turin, Italy, pushed a legal battle to make school lunches optional instead of compulsory. The country’s Supreme Court sided with schools in prohibiting students from bringing home-cooked meals. The court emphasized that such action demonstrates disregard for the principles of equality that school lunches promote. According to the court, bringing packed lunches can result in discrimination as some

15 things before going to law school (Part 2)

Image
This is Part 2 of PJP's on-going series on things you need to know before you decide to go to law school. In Part 1, the last item was on the number of textbooks and pages per day that law students have to read. Here, we start with specific subjects offered in law school and the eight general Bar examination subjects. [1] There are eight general Bar examination subjects. They are: [a] Political law; [b] Labor law; [c] Civil law; [d] Criminal law; [e] Commercial law; [f] Tax law; [g] Remedial law; and [h] Ethics law. [2] These general subjects are divided into specific ones. For example, political law is divided into political law proper (structure of government), constitutional law (rights and government powers), public international law, administrative law, law on public officers and election law. [3] Labor law is divided into labor standards, labor relations and social legislation. [4] Civil law is divided into law on agency, conflict of laws, human relations la

Due process in student disciplinary cases

Image
In Ateneo de Manila University v. Capulong, the Court held that Guzman v. National University, not Ang Tibay v. CIR, is the authority on the procedural rights of students in disciplinary cases. Ang Tibay is the authority regarding due process in administrative proceedings. Guzman laid down the minimum standards in the imposition of disciplinary sanctions in academic institutions, as follows: It bears stressing that due process in disciplinary cases involving students does not entail proceedings and hearings similar to those prescribed for actions and proceedings in courts of justice. The proceedings in student discipline cases may be summary; and cross-examination is not, contrary to petitioners’ view, an essential part thereof. There are withal minimum standards which must be met to satisfy the demands of procedural due process ; and these are, that the students must be informed in writing of the nature and cause of any accusation against them; they shall have the right to answe

15 things before going to law school (Part 1)

Image
Before you go to law school, here are basic things you need to know./For Regina Phalange [1] In law school, professors almost never teach you. They do sometimes point out information or clarify certain details but that seldom happens. If you find a law professor who explains everything to the class, you are lucky. [2] In a sense, law school is easier than undergraduate schools. There are only five requirements: (a) read the books; (b) read the cases; (c) attend classes; (d) try your best during recitation; and (e) do well in exams and quizzes. [3] In another sense, law school is harder than undergraduate schools because textbooks and Supreme Court decisions (jurisprudence) are not very easy to understand. Before entering law school, be sure to understand the basics of our legal system. [4] Speaking of the basics of our legal system,"law" is a general term which refers to the body of rules of conduct that govern our society. "Law," in the strict sense, includ

Sexual harassment; labor standards

Image
The State shall value the dignity of every individual, enhance the development of its human resources, guarantee full respect for human rights, and uphold the dignity of workers, employees, applicants for employment, students or those undergoing training, instruction or education. Towards this end, all forms of sexual harassment in the employment, education or training environment are hereby declared unlawful. Azucena (2013) confirms that sexual harassment is not sufficiently treated by the Labor Code of the Philippines. "Not part of Book III of this Code, yet related to it, is a problem commonly met at the work place, though it exists also in training and educational institutions. It can happen to anyone — industrial or agricultural worker, a manager or a clerk, a male or a female, youthful or otherwise. A discussion of conditions of employment would be deficient if it leaves out the issue of sexual harassment." Republic Act No. 7877, otherwise known as the "Anti-

Strengths, weaknesses of the kasambahay law

Image
Republic Act No. 10361 or the Domestic Workers Act (also known as Batas Kasambahay) declares it a policy to adhere to internationally accepted working conditions for workers in general, and establishes labor standards for domestic workers in particular, towards decent employment and income, enhanced coverage of social protection, respect for human rights and strengthened social dialogue. In protecting domestic workers and recognizing their special needs to ensure safe and healthful working conditions, the law also promotes gender-sensitive measures in the formulation and implementation of policies and programs affecting the local domestic work. Below is a part of an opinion by Daway (2013) regarding the strengths, weaknesses and areas of improvement regarding the kasambahay law. What are the strengths and weakness of the kasambahay law in terms of its enforceability? Strengths. In time, especially so when the unified registration system and the barangay kasambahay master list a

6 basic rights of a kasambahay

Image
Republic Act No. 10361 or the Domestic Workers Act (also known as Batas Kasambahay) recognizes the need to protect the rights of domestic workers against abuse, harassment, violence, economic exploitation and performance of work that is hazardous to their physical and mental health. This is why the law has laid down six (6) basic rights of a domestic worker. Domestic worker or "Kasambahay" refers to any person engaged in domestic work within an employment relationship such as, but not limited to, the following: general househelp, nursemaid or "yaya," cook, gardener, or laundry person, but shall exclude any person who performs domestic work only occasionally or sporadically and not on an occupational basis . The term "kasambahay" shall not include children who are under foster family arrangement, and are provided access to education and given an allowance incidental to education, i.e., "baon," transportation, school projects and school activit

Is impeachment criminal or civil?

Image
Impeachment is a sui generis constitutional process — a class of its own. It is dissimilar to civil, criminal, or administrative cases. At most, impeachment may be considered quasicriminal because it is punitive in character: It might result in the removal from office, and perpetual disqualification to hold any public office, of an impeachable ranking public official. Impeachment is neither a legislative process nor an investigation in aid of legislation. The impeachment process is an exercise by the people, through their duly elected representatives, of the sovereign power to exact accountability from, and impose discipline upon, certain ranking public servants who owe their positions to the Constitution. It is also a mechanism for the implementation of the system of checks and balances in a republican government whose powers are allocated by the Constitution among coequal branches. SOURCE:  Frank E. Lobrigo (2017). Impeachment: A class of its own. December 11, 2017. https://opin

Appeal to CA from VA in 10 or 15 days?

Image
Decisions of voluntary arbitrators (VA) become final and executory after ten (10) calendar days from receipt of the copy of the award or decision by the parties. Section 4, Rule 43 of the Rules gives parties a fifteen (15)-day reglementary period to file a petition for review before the CA. As explained in Philippine Electric Corp v. CA: Despite Rule 43 providing for a 15-day period to appeal, the Voluntary Arbitrator's decision must be appealed before the Court of Appeals within 10 calendar days from receipt of the decision as provided in the Labor Code. Appeal is a "statutory privilege," which may be exercised "only in the manner and in accordance with the provisions of the law." Perfection of an appeal within the reglementary period is not only mandatory but also jurisdictional so that failure to do so rendered the decision final and executory, and deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to alter the final judgment much less to entertain

Impeachment and judicial review

Image
Impeachment, described as "the most formidable weapon in the arsenal of democracy," was foreseen as creating divisions, partialities and enmities, or highlighting pre-existing factions with the greatest danger that "the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt."Given their concededly political character, the precise role of the judiciary in impeachment cases is a matter of utmost importance to ensure the effective functioning of the separate branches while preserving the structure of checks and balance in our government. Moreover, in this jurisdiction, the acts of any branch or instrumentality of the government, including those traditionally entrusted to the political departments, are proper subjects of judicial review if tainted with grave abuse or arbitrariness. Impeachment refers to the power of Congress to remove a public official for serious crimes or misconduct as provided in

Miranda warning

Image
"Miranda Warning" or Miranda Rights arose from a case (Miranda v. Arizona) where Miranda was convicted after he confessed to robbery, kidnapping and rape during interrogation but was later overturned because of the harsh way the investigation was allegedly conducted. This gave rise to the requirement that all criminal suspects be informed of their rights. With the enactment of RA 7438, police officers face 10 years or more of imprisonment if they fail to read the Miranda Rights to the person being arrested. RA 7438 is an act defining certain rights of person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation as well as the duties of the arresting, detaining and investigating officers, and providing penalties for violations thereof. SOURCE: Bartolome (2016). OPINION: Miranda warning. Tin Bartolome. Aug 25 2016 11:07 PM. https://news.abs-cbn.com/blogs/opinions/08/25/16/opinion-miranda-warning. Article III, Section 12, paragraph 1 of the Constitution provides: Any pers