'Spirit giving life' vs. 'Letter that kills'
According to the Code Commission that drafted the Civil Code of the Philippines,
the provisions thereof prioritize "the spirit that giveth life" over "the letter
that killeth." (Report, page 26) This means that equity and justice are
above strict adherence to the literal meaning of the law.
According to Hulst v. PR Builders (G.R. No. 156364, September 3, 2007), unjust
enrichment exists when a person unjustly retains a benefit at the loss of
another, or when a person retains money or property of another against the
fundamental principles of justice, equity and good conscience. The prevention of
unjust enrichment is a recognized public policy of the State, for Article 22 of
the Civil Code explicitly provides that "[e]very person who through an act of
performance by another, or any other means, acquires or comes into possession of
something at the expense of the latter without just or legal ground, shall
return the same to him." It is well to note that Article 22 "is part of the
chapter of the Civil Code on Human Relations, the provisions of which were
formulated as basic principles to be observed for the rightful relationship
between human beings and for the stability of the social order; designed to
indicate certain norms that spring from the fountain of good conscience; guides
for human conduct that should run as golden threads through society to the end
that law may approach its supreme ideal which is the sway and dominance of
justice." (Gonzalo v. Tarnate, G.R. No. 160600, January 15, 2014)
According to Aquino (2005), these general considerations are embodied in
Articles 21 and 26 of the Civil Code. Therefore, justice and equity demand
that persons who may have been damaged by the wrongful or negligent act of
another are compensated.
These guidelines in human relations demand and require that justice be given
and done. This may be in the form of compensation, restitution,
indemnification or any other relief. For example, a person made poorer by
another who has been benefited, with or without fault or negligence, must be
indemnified. This example is called the principle of unjust enrichment.
"Some norm or standard must be available whereby the compromise or
adjustment may take place. This notion is concealed in the philosophic
notion of justice. Interests are to be adjusted in a manner that is just."
(Harper on Torts, pp. 3-4) Law is conceived as a justice-seeking process and
particular laws are therefore evaluated on the basis of their contribution
to the ideal of justice. (Bill Shaw and Art Wolfe, The Structure of Legal
Environment, 1991 Ed., pp. 22-23)