PROJECT JURISPRUDENCE

Here are the cases you will read in your Property Law subject. This article is still under construction. We will try to update it from time to time. Thank you for your patience. Mindanao Bus Co. vs City Assessor,  September 29, 1962 Makati Leasing vs Wearever, May 16, 1983 Evangelista vs Alto Surety, April 23, 1958 Tsai vs Court of Appeals, October 2, 2001 Serg vs PCI Leasing, August 22, 2000 Burgos vs Chief of Staff, December 26, 1984 Lopez vs Orasa, February 28, 1958 Luna vs Encarnacion, June 30, 1952 Lee Yung Yee vs Strong Machinery, February 15, 1918 Cival vs Valdez, August 4, 1927 Bicerra vs Teneza, November 29, 1962 Board of Assessment vs MERALCO, January 31, 1964 CALTEX Philippines vs Board of Assessment, May 31, 1982 Manila Electric vs CBAA, August 5, 2015 Davao Sawmill vs Castillo, August 7, 1935 Benguet vs CBAA, January 29, 1993 US vs Carlos, September 1, 1911 Laurel vs Abrogar, January 13, 2019 PNB v. De Jesus, September 23, 2003 Balucanag v. Francisco, May 30, 1983 Pecson v

The Supreme Court En Banc (“Court”), during its session today, 30 August 2022, acted on the following matter: In G.R. No. 261892 (Kilusan sa Pagbabago ng Industriya ng Transportasyon, Inc. [KAPIT], et al. v. City of Manila, et al.) and G.R. No. 262192 (Atty. Paa v. Sangguniang Panglungsod ng Manila and Mayor Lacuna- Pangan), the Court resolved, and without necessarily giving due course to the Petitions, to: Issue a temporary restraining order (TRO), effective immediately and until further orders from the Court, enjoining all respondents from the implementation of the No Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP) programs and ordinances related thereto. The Court also said that any apprehensions through the NCAP programs and ordinances related thereto shall be prohibited until further orders from the Court; Issue a TRO, effective immediately and until further orders from the Court, enjoining the Land Transportation Office and all parties acting on its behalf from giving out motorist information