Is car driver automatically liable even if death fault of rider?
Outraged by this, netizens usually say, "Unfair talaga ang batas sa Pilipinas!
[Philippine laws are indeed unfair!]" However, people should know that this is
not the law in the Philippines.The practice of police officers in leveling charges and arresting the car
driver is out of fear of retaliation or criticism from the public or the
family members of the deceased rider. The usual thinking is that the person
who died is the victim of the incident. This is entirely wrong.
Under Article 2176 of the New Civil Code of the Philippines, whoever by act or
omission causes damage to another, there being fault or negligence, is obliged
to pay for the damage done. Such fault or negligence, if there is no
pre-existing contractual relation between the parties, is called a
quasi-delict. On the other hand, under Act No. 3815, also known as the Revised
Penal Code of the Philippines, any person who, by reckless imprudence, shall
commit any act which, had it been intentional, would constitute a grave
felony, shall suffer the penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to
prision correccional in its minimum period; if it would have constituted a
less grave felony, the penalty of arresto mayor in its minimum and medium
periods shall be imposed. (Article 365)
Hence, taking into account Article 2176 and Article 365 as mentioned above,
it is the person at fault or the person who acted negligently who should be
arrested and charged. In the above example, the car driver is the victim, not
the tortfeasor or the perpetrator.
It is not healthy to the justice system for the police officers to simply
charge and/or arrest the car driver for the simple and convenient excuse that
they wish to evade flak from the public or the deceased's family members. As
enforcers of the law, they have the power to determine probable cause under
Section 5 of Rule 113 of the Rules of Court (Criminal Procedure).